this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
193 points (98.0% liked)

Games

16812 readers
703 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Summzashi@lemmy.one -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's an amazing amount of naivety on display.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This sort of empty shit comment is worse than telling anyone to go fuck themselves.

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.one -5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In that case go fuck yourself and learn some basic economics before you open your hole again.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

bAsIc eCoNoMiCs is even less meaningful than just scoffing about naivete. Which you misspelled.

I'm making a normative statement about how this studio - which successfully made a beloved and profitable game, as a product that over a million people paid for - was still treated like it failed, lost money, and ruined everything. And that statement is, if success isn't good enough, that's fucking bullshit.

And the thorn that puts in your side is... that it's not capitalist enough? My guy, do you think the children's introductory textbook version of supply and demand has a footnote about destroying successful companies for shits and giggles? Or maybe you only spit that libertarian shibboleth at anything besides line-go-up. In just two words, you've assured that I don't know and I don't care.

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.one -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If a misspelled word is your opening argument the rest of your pointless essay isn't worth reading. Go back to school.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It wasn't, but cling to whatever shields your ego.

And consider your own advice - "basic" doesn't mean "fundamental." It means "for children." Try advanced economics.