this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
193 points (98.0% liked)

Games

16812 readers
703 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prof@infosec.pub 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If the studios had the resources they could easily become independent. But the corporate side owns the rights to their works, so the now independent studio doesn't have any incoming revenue.

The average employee won't work for scraps or nothing. So it's effectively over if big corpo cuts them off.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

'They could but they can't' is certainly almost a take.

[–] prof@infosec.pub 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Misrepresenting what I'm saying is not nice of you.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Missing the point of is versus ought is just bewildering.

[–] prof@infosec.pub 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why even engage if you're not interested in discussion?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That is not what happened here. I am saying: buying a studio and saying whoops you don't exist anymore should not happen. You are saying: but it does. Because copyright? Even for shit that's not out yet. A bunch of these closures involve killing unreleased projects, which are obviously never going to go anywhere in the hands of whichever robots own them. Tell me their ownership matters and you will see what backlash looks like.

[–] prof@infosec.pub 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for explaining. I was not arguing the point that closures happen, just expanding on why it's not easy for the studios to get back on their feet again as independents.

There will likely be non-disclosure agreements, non-competes or simply IP rights to take into consideration if we want to argue why these studios can't continue their work. In the end it comes down to legal stuff and money. The IP rights even for unreleased products very likely are with the parent corporation. The same goes for the codebase.

So yeah. The studios are left with nothing, except a severance pay if they're lucky.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Normative statements are a novel concept to some people.

Pointing to all that and going AND THAT'S HORSESHIT is not a factual argument - it's a moral judgement.

I'm not saying it's untrue. I'm saying it's unacceptable.

In short:

Fuck.

That.

[–] prof@infosec.pub 3 points 6 months ago

Well, you can only win against big corpo if you shoot them with their own guns.

Or literal guns.