this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

memes

22668 readers
490 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it's a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I don't think anyone really considers pol pot a communist mate. And who was it that ended the Khmer Rouge hmm? Communists.

He was brainwormed from the start, lacked a lot of theory that we usually consider essential, and seriously was deeply reactionary. He was communist when he wanted China's support(announced in 1977), and then in 1981 he disbanded the communist party when he wanted capitalist support. The man was a monster and an opportunist that did whatever he had to.

But don't believe me, here's quite an important quote:

"We are not communists ... we are revolutionaries" who do not 'belong to the commonly accepted grouping of communist Indochina."

-- Leng Sary, 1977 Former Minister for Foreign Affairs of Cambodia

Declaring Pol Pot's actions the fault of communism when the Khmer Rouge were only publicly declared ""communist"" for the 4 years of 1977-1981 when the Khmer rouge existed in total between 1951 and 1999 is utterly absurd and is only the kind of thing that people who don't know the history do.

If anything they had a hardline anticommunists stance from the moment they were thrown out by the actual communist vietnamese in 1979, and they found support among capitalists, notably Thailand who used them as a buffer against communism spreading to Thailand.

[–] redhotpepper@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Wikipedia puts the name change at 1971. In what way was the Khmer Rouge not a Communist party? They were literally forcing the entire population onto agricultural communes. One quote from a foreign minister doesn't move the goalpost.

Vietnam didn't ride in to heroically liberate Cambodia from "pretend communists", it was literally in response to military aggression ordered by Pol Pot.

[–] KarlBarqs@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In what way was the Khmer Rouge not a Communist party?

In literally every way that matters. A name is just a name, a political party can call themselves anything they want, and none of their politics were communist in any way.

Granted, you're probably one of those dipshits who thinks the Nazis were socialist, given your fixation on names.

[–] redhotpepper@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yikes bud, no need to attack someone who gives zero value to your opinion. Save if for someone who cares.

[–] KarlBarqs@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Ossay@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

I DON'T CARE I DON'T CARE I DON'T CARE corn-man-khrush

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)