this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
2 points (66.7% liked)
English usage and grammar
363 readers
82 users here now
A community to discuss and ask questions about English usage and grammar.
If your post refers to a specific English variant, please indicate it within square brackets (for instance [Canadian]
).
Online resources:
- Cambridge English Dictionary
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary and Thesaurus
- Gilman's Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. This is a great and witty reference about usage, its history, and its controveries
Sibling communities:
Rules of conduct:
The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon.. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.
(Icon: entry "English" in the Oxford English Dictionary, 1933. Banner: page from Chaucer's "The Wife of Bath's Tale".)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It depends how you’re counting I think. If you’re just counting things, you would normally just say the number, “the 100th widget” or “the 100th day”. No need for any other descriptor. But if you’re counting things relative to time, I would say “100 widgets later” or “100 days later.” Next is very specific since it refers to only the thing directly after the current one, so it isn’t really used for high amounts of things.
I don’t have a reference since this was never directly taught in any of the schools I went to. This is just how I’ve always heard other people say it.
Thank you. The problem with "the 100th widget" is that it would refer to the 100th since the sequence started, but I'd like to refer the the 100th if I were to start counting now. "100 widgets later" is an adverb rather than an adjective, but maybe I can build a sentence around it.
You can just say “the 100th from now”
Thank you for confirming that! I was very unsure.
@BD1sHappyFeet@lemm.ee @memmypemmy@lemm.ee I've added some clarification and an example.