this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
571 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

11004 readers
2432 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 51 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

There are more kinds of beetles in the world than any other animal.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I needed a clarification, Wikipedia had your back.

The Coleoptera, with about 400,000 described species, is the largest of all orders, constituting almost 40% of described insects and 25% of all known animal species; new species are discovered frequently, with estimates suggesting that there are between 0.9 and 2.1 million total species.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beetle

[–] HidingUnderHats@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Note that this is described species. Beetles are really easy to preserve and are often super cool. There are likely more species in other orders, but they haven't had as much work done on them. Hymenoptera, for example, with all of the parasitic wasps probably has more species but they can be so freaking small and difficult to work with.

Sorry, I am like a wanna be entomologist who works with akshual entomologists and this is one of the things that triggers them

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I recently heard a tidbit that we think there's less bugs in the air because windshields aren't as dirty. Like, if that's our indicator on such a huge and fundamental part of life on this planet... Less bugs on the windshield. We have no idea

[–] smeg 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's not even very good logic (in my humble, non-expert opinion). There are more cars about, so even if the number of bugs was the same there would be less bugs per car, and that ignores that cars are more aerodynamic and so are probably just killing less bugs anyway!

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

The aerodynamic thing is where money is at. I drive a 91 jeep and I still have to use the windo washer at the gas station, cause the wipers are insufficient.

[–] sep@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I imagined they used bugs per license plate for that. Since those are fixed size and vertical.

[–] smeg 2 points 6 months ago

There's probably still a bit of aerodynamic effect, but yeah that sounds a lot more scientific!

[–] maculata@aussie.zone 5 points 6 months ago

Wot?

John

Paul

George

Ringo

That’s FOUR. Only four.