this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
1065 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32410 readers
565 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only charlatans were recommending blockchain for everything. It was painfully obvious how inefficiently it solved a non-existent problem.

[–] Rufio@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You could always tell because no one could ever really explain it in simple terms what it does or why it was useful, other than trying to defend NFTs existing and enjoying the volatility of the crypto market (not currency).

[–] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean it has it's uses. You can consider it as a tower made up building blocks. We can write things into the blocks as we build the tower, and every block is inspected by people worldwide to make sure no one's messing with it's contents and they can't be changed after the block has been placed.

[–] bric@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

It's a really cool technology, but the main problem is that letting people around the world inspect and verify just isn't needed in most use cases. It does a great job at removing the central source of truth, but rarely does anyone explain what the problem with a central source of truth was. Especially when you're talking about a company setting, startups don't want to build open source software without a source of truth, they want to be the source of truth