this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
381 points (96.8% liked)

BecomeMe

801 readers
1 users here now

Social Experiment. Become Me. What I see, you see.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yes. That's why I use Win7 for legacy stuff and Linux for everything else. On Win7 it was still easy to deactivate (disable a few Tasks and a few checkboxes). Since the updates stopped that PC is super stable too.

~no~ ~need~ ~to~ ~lecture~ ~me~ ~about~ ~muh~ ~sEcuRitY~ ~uPdAtEs.~ ~I~ ~know.~ ~As~ ~if~ ~any~ ~Microsoft~ ~Software~ ~was~ ~ever~ ~secure.~

[–] lud@lemm.ee -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Microsoft software software isn't really insecure.

[–] HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. That was a good one. Maybe compared to what Cisco does they are passable.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy really is just an anti Windows circlejerk that ignores all facts.

[–] HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What facts? Genuinely curious. Microsoft Software in general is pretty bad when it comes to found and or exploited security problems.
I admit with all the legacy compatibility it must be hard to maintain Windows, but other projects manage that better.

This is no proof, but a data point: https://www.cvedetails.com/top-50-vendors.php