this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
-10 points (38.1% liked)

Fediverse

17779 readers
40 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
-10
Looking for a free speech instance (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by rist097@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am looking to change my instance since many defederation and censorship decisions on lemmy.world.

Anyone knows of any instance that has a rule against defederation and is more free speech oriented. Of course I am looking for an instance that forbids illegal content like CP. But I want an instance that does not censor hate speech!

The instance should be hopefully federated with mostly everyone, unless defederated because of CP. I was considering lemm.ee, but I saw a comment from an admin saying that they could consider defederation if certain propaganda reaches front page.

Before anyone accuses me of anything, I just want to be exposed to different viewpoints, and I am not offended so easily, so I can tolerate offensive content. What is important is that the rules on defederation dont change in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fustigation769curtain@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It’s not hate speech though based on the legal description in Canada.

I never mentioned canada or any laws. Do you think it should be considered hate speech?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

I'm a Canadian, so the only hate speech laws that I care about are the ones for my country.

No I do not think intentional misgendering should be considered hate speech (in the legal sense)

I would absolutely fire an employee of mine for doing it though, even if I found out they did it outside of a work context.

Just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean there shouldn't be consequences for it.