this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
1105 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59627 readers
3363 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Reddit, AI spam bots explore new ways to show ads in your feed

#For sale: Ads that look like legit Reddit user posts

"We highly recommend only mentioning the brand name of your product since mentioning links in posts makes the post more likely to be reported as spam and hidden. We find that humans don't usually type out full URLs in natural conversation and plus, most Internet users are happy to do a quick Google Search," ReplyGuy's website reads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 127 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The law requires YouTubers to identify sponsored segments. I don't see why that shouldn't also be applied to social media posts.

[–] hayes_@sh.itjust.works 81 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The law does apply to social media posts.

The social media company has to mark sponsored content and give users the means to do so themselves (when the partnership is between the user and a third party rather than the social media company).

Unfortunately it’s hard to prove and profitable to lie.

[–] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

social media corporations can be made liable under the law, well how about here in Lemmy, where the instance owner may not even know that companies are creating bots and posting discrete advertisements, or hiring trolls/shills to advertise for them?

[–] 2deck@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is it difficult to prove that's what's explicitly being sold in this case?

[–] pumpkinseedoil@feddit.de 3 points 7 months ago

It's hard since it could theoretically also be an actual user who used that website themself.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The law requires YouTubers to identify sponsored segments.

In which countries, though? That's a key point that seems missed from a lot of responses discussing "the law".

Laws vary quite significantly from nation to nation, and without that key context, there's not much that can be garnered.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

The US, for one, which pretty much makes it apply universally anywhere on YouTube, Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc, as they're all US companies.