this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
1908 points (95.4% liked)

Comic Strips

12019 readers
2056 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CoolMatt@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

Hi I'm a fucking idiot, how can you beat cancer if there is no cure for it yet?

I thought there was a cure but I guess not a very good one since some people don't make it

Edit: Thank you for the answers, that really cleared it up for me, and I understand cancer a bit better now.

[–] Bolt@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

A "cure" in this situation means an essentially guaranteed method of treatment. Cancers vary greatly, with some being benign, some being very treatable, and some being extremely deadly (at least with current technology).

[–] Digestive_Biscuit 7 points 4 months ago

Indeed. Beat it, but at what cost.

My mum beat cancer. She lost parts of her body in the process and chemo changed her physically (her hair and nails never came back the same). It took three years of regular testing to finally be given the "you're officially cancer free" verdict. Three tense years.

All that said she's incredibly lucky not only to have beat it but not to have to live with additional medication due to it. I know somebody who lost a lot more and while is alive now needs a lifetime of medication to "put in" what the partial removed organs no longer produce.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Cancer, as far as I'm aware, goes into remission and isn't cured. Remission is when there isn't any detectable signs of a cancer mass or growth in your body. So imaging doesn't pick up any tumors, your blood work doesn't indicate any hormonal changes, and biopsies come back negative.

A cure would be like say there is no cancer and it won't come back. Remission is more like we have no evidence of cancer and x% of maintain that state for x years.

Fun fact: your body is constantly making cancerous cells, but you have the ability to detect and destroy them before they get out of hand. Keep that immune system strong.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Did you know that you can cure your meat and beat it?

Maybe not in that order.

[–] CoolMatt@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

Thank you for the giggle, SatansMaggotyCumFart

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Right now, the main option to "beat" cancer is to poison yourself until enough of the cancerous cells die, along with killing the normal healthy cells. Even then, that only works for certain types of cancer, and that's only if it is treated early enough.

https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/cancer-survival-rates

A cure would ideally work safely against all types and stages.

[–] Devi@kbin.social 1 points 4 months ago

That's very simplistic, there's loads of cancer treatments, what you're describing is a kind of broad brush chemotherapy, but there's lots of more targeted versions, then loads of different pills and potions, immunotherapies, radiotherapies and the good old "cut the thing out" method.

Cancer treatment is the best funded area of medicine and there's loooads of advances going on all the time.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] lugal@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

You can cure pregnancy with a fist but not cancer

[–] CoolMatt@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Boof, biff, pow!

[–] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

There are some treatments for some cancers with varying success rates. A cure would be a treatment for all cancers that always works.