this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
454 points (93.5% liked)

okmatewanker

621 readers
23 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French ๐Ÿคฎ

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] kattenluik@feddit.nl 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

As if you wouldn't steal a ยฃ30 pound steak if it had zero consequences and no morals attached, besides that I don't think anything deserves to be abused before getting killed and especially not in public with children watching.

[โ€“] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying he should had been more effective in killing the seagull in front of the kids

[โ€“] kattenluik@feddit.nl 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He just shouldn't have done it, but obviously yes that too.

[โ€“] Wooki@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Obviously a waste of good avian meat

[โ€“] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

if it had zero consequences

And yet, here there were consequences.

It's just a specific breeding programme and he was culling the failures. #evolution \s

[โ€“] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Exactly, he's helping nature

[โ€“] little_tuptup@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't see where it says he abused the bird before killing it.

[โ€“] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

exactly, the swing probably was to get enough speed

[โ€“] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago

Pretty sure it dying instantly in a quick whack is the opposite of being abused

Like no he shouldn't have done that but you're going a little overboard