this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
867 points (97.9% liked)

Comics

5987 readers
552 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Not exactly. Things are moving relative to each other, but it really is all relative and local. There's no central point in the universe that the earth is moving away from. The earth is moving relative to the sun. But relative to you, the earth isn't moving. Relative to the earth, the sun is moving.

There's no reason for her to move away from the earth unless she's being accelerated by something. It's not like the earth would zip away because it is moving relative to some distant, arbitrary point and she suddenly becomes "stationary". There's no universal "stationary".

I guess where it gets messy is that the earth IS being accelerated to some extent by different things (other planets, the moon, etc). I'm not sure how much. So if she didn't accelerate along with it at all, it would move away from her.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

There’s no reason for her to move away from the earth unless she’s being accelerated by something.

Isn't the Earth accelerated by the Sun's gravity, while she isn't anymore? If yes, she would keep going straight while Earth keeps following its circular orbit, which is equivalent to her moving away from Earth.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

You know...I believe you're right. If she somehow became totally massless.

Edit: no, as other people pointed out it doesn't make any sense that she wouldn't be "affected" by gravity even with no mass.

[–] Alk@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I think the existence of ghosts at all implies at the least some sort of spiritual plane or dimension that they're partially in, or at the "worst" straight up magic wherein ghosts cannot interact with the physical world, even with gravity.

Being able to see may be part of that magic or a function of the spiritual plane as well.

That would, I think, be able to explain the events of the comic.

If instead we assume ghosts were entirely explainable by science, that could change things. We'd also have to account for the photons interacting with her and letting her see.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 8 months ago

Edit: no, as other people pointed out it doesn’t make any sense that she wouldn’t be “affected” by gravity even with no mass.

That's the assumption in my comment: "while she isn’t anymore" accelerated by gravity. I think that's what we could infer from the trajectory on the comics.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

again, straight compared to what?

there is no center of the universe, nor a universal grid that things can reference. one of the most fundamental tenets of astrophysics is that everything is relative and statements like "travelling straight" are simply nonsensical unless you specify what it's travelling straight in relation to.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The... Earth and Sun.

Those are the reference frames.

You start by traveling with the Earth.
Gravity "turns off" for you.
The Earth then curves away as it orbits the Sun.

You just follow the tangent line.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, that was my point. I think it aligns good enough with the comics.

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If she is still affected by gravity, but passes through matter, she would immedietly fall through the floor and start orbiting the earth through the planet.

Without gravity she would no longer follow the earth's/sun's/etc. orbit.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

but the question is what would determine the trajectory then, there is no universal arbitrary straight line, that's a concept that just doesn't make sense under physics as we know it.

Even massless particles gain an effective mass and thus interact with gravity/spacetime; according to everything we've observed and calculated so far the only sensible result is acting like light does, and weakly interacting with gravity.

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, yea, idk how moving through spacetime without following it's curvature would makes any sense. Which is what gravity is. Meaning the comic makes no sense.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Meaning the comic makes no sense.

Holy shit, you're right.

What the absolute fuck OP

[–] Alk@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I thought we were so close to solving it too. Too bad it's all a scam. A malicious lie made to trick the foolish.