this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
31 points (97.0% liked)
Open Source
31374 readers
179 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Even that doesn't emulate selective sync... Well, I'd say it's a form of selective sync, just different than what I think OP is talking about.
In Resilio, I can ad-hoc select files/folders to sync now.
For example, if I setup a Resilio sync of my 2TB media folder, my phone will get an index of that share/sync job. I can then browse through the indexed folders, select files to sync, click OK and it will sync just those files right now.
Syncthing doesn't work this way.
I don't really use Resilio much, it's too ram heavy on my phone, so I only launch it for such selective sync tasks. Otherwise I let Syncthing handle my day-to-day data sync - it's much more battery and memory friendly for me. Just wish it had this kind of ad-hoc sync.
Yes, and what makes it impossible to create a GUI for Syncthing that does the same thing? It just had to list the folders and allow you to pick what you want instead a text box to enter ignore rules.
Oh, I just found a tool that does exactly what I was typing: https://github.com/galilley/syncthing-pyselective
I never got the fuzz around Syncthing not having selective sync and the alleged complexity of making it. That tools does what I always think was possible to do, or am I missing something?
@basiliscos@lemmy.ml ?
I think the problem is that they do not share the whole communication protocol/model with GUI/client and it has only feature to block something aposteriory masks, while the whole folder with all files is already shared with client's device. The original syncthing database scheme also seems does not supporting this.
Technically, from a protocol view level, there is no problem just to ask a single file to download and share only it.
Okay so it's totally a GUI thing and people from the project being hard headed. Thanks for the clarification.