this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
104 points (97.3% liked)

Open Source

31374 readers
139 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Inspired by Apple's Airdrop

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrus@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I found LocalSend to be significantly more reliable than Snapdrop. Also it doesn't require hosting.

[–] vort3@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But can you use it to send to a device where you can't install stuff?

[–] mrus@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] vort3@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

If you want to send something to a computer in school or a work PC or something without admin rights.

snapdrop / sharedrop work in browser, without any installation, and that's the point. As much as I hate web apps, sometimes they are your only option.

I agree that localsend is great when you need to exchange files between your devices often, but when you quickly need to send a file to someone's PC without admin rights, snapdrop and sharedrop are a faster way to achieve that.

[–] marsxyz@hexbear.net 1 points 7 months ago

I'll try. Snapdrop is almost good

[–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 7 months ago

It’s easier to get someone to visit a website than to make them download an app