this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37608 readers
285 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
88
Beeper is now available, no waitlist! (blog.beeper.com)
submitted 5 months ago by remington@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago

Somewhat. It's kind of a gradation:

  • 3rd party servers, or closed source, no trust.
  • Self-hosting on a hosting provider... it's not my hardware, but maybe some trust.
  • OpenSource with non-reproducible builds, even self-hosted at home, little trust.
  • Local bridges, OpenSource, with reproducible builds, and a 3rd party audit, most trust.

All software can have bugs, and we've seen what cases like xz-util can bring, so I would rather have no decrypting bridges at all, particularly for sensitive information... but for random private chats, "mostly trusted" sounds like enough.

Public conversations (like this one) are fine going through random bridges, but I feel like bridging with E2EE networks, is subverting user expectations.