this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
76 points (98.7% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Beijing's industrial subsidies are on average three to four times higher than in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries โ€” sometimes up to nine times as much. A report published this week by IfW-Kiel estimated that industrial subsidies amounted to โ‚ฌ221 billion or 1.73% of China's gross domestic product in 2019. Another study put annual subsidies typically at around 5% of GDP.

The IfW-Kiel report revealed how Chinese subsidies for domestic green-tech firms had increased significantly in 2022. The world's largest EV maker, BYD, received โ‚ฌ2.1 billion, compared with โ‚ฌ220 million just two years earlier. Support for wind turbine maker Mingyang rose from โ‚ฌ20 million to โ‚ฌ52 million.

Europe's green-energy sector has already taken a beating from cheap Chinese imports of solar panels, which have wiped out several domestic players and prompted an EU anti-subsidy probe. Though EU countries installed record levels of solar capacity last year โ€” 40% more than in 2022 โ€” the vast majority of panels and parts came from China, according to data from the International Energy Agency.

Analysts argue that China can't succeed without strong and stable markets for its products, which should give US and EU leaders the edge in negotiations with Beijing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 0x815@feddit.de 12 points 7 months ago (3 children)

honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Ah, if you can't attack the content, attack the OP. Doesn't whataboutism work anymore?

[โ€“] honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, unlike you I don't post constant articles about China. I'd prefer not to see propaganda, whether that's Chinese funded propaganda, or your constant posting of anti-Chinese free market biased articles. If the rules of this sub didn't explicitly carve out an exception for you, maybe you would've been banned by now - unfortunately, only "foreign" and "billionaire" misinformation is banned from this sub, domestic/western misinformation is OK.

Also, I will respond to the article, but I'm not a paid state actor who does this as a full time job (unlike maybe you, otherwise your obsession with China is pretty weird), so I don't have the time to tackle the multiple articles you post about China ever day. I can only do so much as a normal person, and I can only really tackle the articles I have knowledge about (e.g. economics).

[โ€“] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Block OP if you don't like his content and stop whining.

There you go, here's your response to the article (below). It took me 43 minutes to respond, while it took you a single copy paste to post the article (probably 5 seconds of effort). Maybe now you understand why I don't feel like responding to every single thing you post with a debunking? The effort it takes to tackle misinformation is much higher than simply copy pasting URLs.