Linux

4962 readers

346 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Red Hat’s new source code policy and the intense pushback, explained (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by solidsnail@programming.dev to c/linux@programming.dev

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] solidsnail@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think technically what they sell is services related to RHEL and not it itself (correct me if I'm wrong).
To me at least, a big problem with it is the hypocrisy. RHEL started itself by repackaging another piece of software. Why is it not OK for others to do the same to them? Especially when the gpl license allows that, and requires them to allow that!

The Linux license allows anyone to distribute it for profit (under certain conditions). If I wanted to sell CDs with the Linux kernel I could. Wouldn't be a good business, but I could.

[–] maxamillion@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Red Hat also maintains the software they ship to customers for 10-15 years, LONNNG after upstreams have abandoned them.