this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
222 points (95.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43936 readers
614 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this some sort of remnant of evangelical puritan protestant ideology?

I don't understaun this.

If you ask me, it'd make as much sense as Orthodox and Christians.... or Shia and Muslim...

I know not all Christians are Catholics but for feck's sake...

They're all Christians to me....

Edit:

It's a U.S thing but this is the sort of things I hear...

https://www.gotquestions.org/Catholic-Christian.html

I am a Catholic. Why should I consider becoming a Christian?

I now know more distinctions (apparently Catholicism requires duty and salvation is process, unlike Protestantism?) but I still think they're of a similar branch (Christianity) so I just wonder the social factor

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OmgItBurns@discuss.online 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I grew up going to various Christian schools as a kid. While it wasn't a common viewpoint, I did hear of it from time to time.

The reason behind it, to my knowledge, was that Catholic practices would often be significantly different from other denominations' practices. The biggest thing I can think of is the veneration of and praying to saints.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The biggest thing I can think of is the veneration of and praying to saints.

Which, ironically, is a core part of Abrahamic religions which was abandoned by Protestantism. I.e. Catholicism didn't add minor gods, Protestantism removed them.

Fun fact: the "-el" at the end of all angel names (except Lucifer and Satan, I guess) means "god". Not as in "from god", but as in "the god of-".

[–] muddi@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lucifer's Hebrew name is Helel!

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago
[–] Maturin@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Genuine question (and I don’t know if you’ve gone down this rabbit hole) but does “el” in the context of Hebrew names refer to the concept of any god generically or was “el” the name of the one monotheistic god (before being combined with the monotheistic god with the other name) and the “els” in the names of the angels meant to be an attachment to the court of the one god in a similar way to “isra-el” being not another god but a kingdom/people bearing the name of the god it served (of course talking about biblical Israel and not the modern state).

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The early Abrahamic and general Canaanite religions are super interesting, I absolutely recommend reading on them. Now, considering I'm neither a historian nor a linguistics expert, take anything I say with a grain of salt.
From my understanding and memory on the subject, "El" was used as the noun "god", as the name of the Canaanite chief god, who would later be usurped by YHWH, and as a title of sorts, meant to indicate gods and important people supposedly affiliated with the pantheon chieftain. I believe the latter is related to the older Assyrian culture, it certainly follows the same pattern. The first and second cases weren't widely concurrent, however - there is a clear trace telling us the original pantheon leader lost influence over time before being relegated to "just another god" and finally getting absorbed into the figure of YHWH, a bit like how Odinn slowly faded into the background of Nordic religion as Thor became the figure you'd pray to.

In short: both of your scenarios are right, but at different points in history (except they weren't monotheistic at first).

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is true about El.

I don't remember if YHWH is associated with Assyrian culture though.

But if anyone is interested, I recommend reading Mark S. Smith's The Early History of God. It's very dry and dense, but extremely informative.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I didn't mean to imply a relation between YHWH and Assyria, but rather link the Assyrian culture of appending god names to important figures' names and the Canaanite culture of appending "-el" to indicate allegiance.