this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
146 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
433 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Twitter owner calls Facebook founder a ‘cuck’ as rancour grows over launch of Threads, a competitor to Musk’s network"

Man I thought this was The Onion at first

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] collegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you want a stagnant society?

[–] middlemuddle@beehaw.org 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, because the US immediately post-WW2 was an incredibly stagnant society with no visible benefits to the middle class.

[–] collegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What the fuck are you on about

[–] NotSteve_@beehaw.org 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not American but the US had an extremely high tax rate on the rich for most of its prosperous years. It was only recent removed and you now have massive wealth inequality

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to mention fantastic spending on college/university (GI Bill) to both slow the impact of returning military on the job market and to create a highly educated work force. Also, incredible help for people to become homeowners, creating generational wealth (GI Bill again), unless you were black.

People act like high taxes on the wealthy would be a problem, when in reality what happened is the wealthy poured more of the excess wealth into their businesses, which benefitted everyone. It's so annoying that we freaking know what works and what doesn't (trickle-down), yet still argue about their efficacy.

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

I love how the "conservative" idea is to return to 1950s socially, but sure not economically! It's also pretty clear that this idea that somehow having a 1% is driving the nation. Case in point this spat! Does Musk and Zuck fighting or competing in social media do much of anything for the country as a whole? At most, it's similar to what DC and Marvel competing in entertainment IMHO. I guess Twitter vs Facebook does something regarding society, but making it non-stagnant? I guess a lot of people were introduced to the term 'cuck'.

Well slap my balls, TIL.

Bet you thats why trusts and such were invented…

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe do some reading on the history of taxation in the US. I'm surprised you're unfamiliar with what they're referring to when you hold such strong opinions on the matter.

I see now, didn’t know

[–] vern1@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

Not OP, but we actually had a tax rate that high back then, and the US experienced unprecedented economic growth and technological innovation, along with an insanely strong middle class.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago

Well I don't, so I strongly support anti-trust legislation and much higher taxes on the wealthy, on wealth, to prevent stagnation.