this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
835 points (96.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5903 readers
3679 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think you’re misunderstanding a bit what I mean.

The Roman people have every reason to change the narrative to make it the others who killed him.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

No I think I totally agree and understand exactly what you mean. 🙃🙃

I promise my comment is only saying what it said, face value. No subtext lol :)

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is a lot of anti-Semitic history in the retelling of this myth so sometimes it’s hard to understand where people are coming from.

Judaism was not compatible with the polytheistic religions of the time, it specifically had a militaristic bend to it which is part of why they were persecuted and chased off time and again and also fought hard for their land. It was a seed change in ideas, suddenly your god was a problem because this god said no others.

That inherently isn’t bad, human nature and whatnot.

The Roman’s didn’t give a fuck beyond enforcing the local peace and getting their due. Their whole system relied on being pragmatic and open to the local religions.

Who decided that this mythological person needed to be executed is here-say, whether it even happened is here-say.

What is easy to pick out is the push for the narrative to be at the hands of the evil bad guys which is where things get kinda gross.

With no records of the event why are we saying one side did it over the other.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 8 months ago

understood! yeah sorry if i gave any impression of the opposing position. that’s not at all the case.