this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)

Git

2877 readers
20 users here now

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Resources

Rules

  1. Follow programming.dev rules
  2. Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
  3. No spam of tools/companies/advertisements. It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.

Git Logo by Jason Long is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
canpolat@programming.dev
jnovinger@programming.dev
60
Git tip: switch to previous branch (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by canpolat@programming.dev to c/git@programming.dev
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

You can use git switch - to switch to the previous branch. In the following example, we see switching back and forth between branches main and my_dev_branch:

C:\git\my-repo [my_dev_branch]> git switch -
Switched to branch 'main'
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/main'.
C:\git\my-repo [main ≡]> git switch -
Switched to branch 'my_dev_branch'
C:\git\my-repo [my_dev_branch]>

Edit: Old habits die hard. Updated to use switch instead of checkout since switch has a clearer responsibility. Obviously they work exactly the same for this scenario.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Use switch, boomer!

[–] canpolat@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Old habits die hard. Thanks for pointing this out. I updated the post.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh lol, I was just trying to poke fun, sorry if it came across as accusatory. 😎👍

[–] canpolat@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Not at all. It was a funny comment (I upvoted it) 👍 But you are also right. It makes more sense to refer to switch and restore whenever possible.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the difference? Genuine question

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Checkout was one of those commands that I joking would call Turing complete because of how much you can do with it (I haven't actually tried to see if it is, but am fully prepared for someone to be nerd sniped and tell me it actually is). I think they're mostly the same, but switch and restore were added as more straightforward versions of checkout and reset.

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well one starts with an s, the other with a c... :P

They changed the command to clarify what it does, checkout was / is used for switching branches as well as branch creation but has connotations of doing some locking in the repo from older vcs software.... I think. the new commands are switch and branch. check the docs

Idk what the deal is with switch, I thought it wasn't supposed to be creating branches but right in the docs there's a flag for it???

Im the kind of user that just deletes .git and starts over when I f up the repo, so take my git advice with a tablespoon of salt.

[–] ray_gay@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I switch to using switch since git switch auto-creates the local branch from the remote branch, if the branch doesn't exist yet, and a remote branch with the corresponding name exists.
Also git switch -c for auto-creating a new branch, even if there is no remote branch for it

[–] jnareb@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

If I remember it correctly, git checkout also automatically creates the local branch from the remote branch (of the same name), and sets up tracking.

[–] Nibbler@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

NEVER!!

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Came here to say this