Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54539 readers

254 users here now

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

353

submitted 7 months ago by ardi60@reddthat.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 30 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Why TF would you put it on gitlab instead of hosting your own forejo instance?

I swear, some people are just too eager to get in headlines rather than thinking things through.

[–] Sauce@hexbear.net 34 points 7 months ago (1 children)

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I wonder why they didn't selfhost GitLab. It and sourcehut are the ones that aren't ugly

[–] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

if you put it on gitlab, you're not the one getting sued when they take it down

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 4 points 7 months ago

I am more saying it's not surprising Gitlab would take it down.

For example. With yt-dl /github they immediately went to a self hosted Gitlab instance. It wasn't simply a hasty move to the public Gitlab instance.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

For all the free publicity when it gets taken down. They were probably hosting it six different ways already