this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

Python

6230 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

📅 Events

October 2023

November 2023

PastJuly 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
💓 Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse
Communities
Projects
Feeds

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
erlingur@programming.dev
jnovinger@programming.dev
37
How to improve Python packaging, or why fourteen tools are at least twelve too many (chriswarrick.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by oscar@programming.dev to c/python@programming.dev
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I stumbled upon this while researching package management options for python, and found it a really interesting read.

I like python as a language but this mess is something that needs to be addressed for me to consider python for future projects. I can't imagine how confusing it must be for new users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] coffeewithalex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That can't be achieved due to dependency compatibility. What if you installed y==1.4, and froze it for a while, and then you install x==3.2, and it depends on y==1.5 or later?

pyproject.toml defines dependency restrictions, so it will be in accordance with that, but the lock file will change every time you add/remove dependencies. Naturally.

[–] Fenzik@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t find that behaviour natural unless there is a hard conflict or I request it. So I guess it’s just a philosophical difference that led me to having a bad tint with it.

[–] qwop@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

If you use poetry add it should only update what is necessary, and you can use poetry lock --no-update to lock without updating everything.