this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
290 points (93.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43816 readers
1193 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
mekhos@lemmy.ml
tmpod@lemmy.pt
14specks@lemmy.ml
290
Where do you go on Lemmy for reliable news and politics? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Ohthereyouare@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm enjoying Lemmy so far, for the most part.

Everything here is pretty good save for the fact that all the news and politics I can find is dominated by the same few accounts.

Half or more of the accounts have a very clear agenda. They modify headlines. Lie. Spread disinformation. And generally are just extremely toxic groups.

It doesn't seem to be a secret here either. And moderators appear to have no interest in putting a stop to it.

So, where are you subbed to for reliable news and US/Global politics?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zdrvr@lemm.ee 108 points 1 year ago (4 children)

While not perfect AP and Reuters are ok. The news they report is honest but their shortcoming is what they don't report.

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is how I do it as well. In general, understanding the overall bias of each news organization is more important to keeping yourself informed. You can combat the echo chamber effect by knowing what the biases of each source is and using differing sourcing to try to get as complete a picture as you can.

I would add to your list to check BBC, Al Jazeera, and NPR if you're US focused.

[–] sveri@lemmy.sveri.de 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am curious war the bias of Reuters is?

[–] InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

As the original comment implied, AP News and Reuters are reasonably unbiased in reliable in terms of their coverage. They do have a US focus so a lot of the pieces need to be read through that specific lens. Sometimes the omission of information is just as important and what is included.

[–] ablackcatstail@lemmy.goblackcat.com 7 points 1 year ago

Those are pretty good examples. They are still not great places to go but they certainly suck a whole lot less than the others. Hell, even the weather is now being reported as entertainment.

[–] MrPear@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish for AP to have RSS feeds, but they don't. I think they and Reuters are aome of the better outlets out there and I've been (re)discovering RSS lately, but AP is one of the few news outlets that don't seem to support it :(

[–] pensivepangolin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

RSSbridge may have you covered there! They’ve got a bunch of instances running you can check!

[–] Rambler@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Quite right, AP do have rss news feeds (rsshub is one - amongst others) - there are posts on lemmy related to this topic.

[–] MrPear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting! I'm going to look into it, thanks!