For me the difference is using cluster munitions in defense of your country. It's not by choice, it's by necessity. Like most nuclear powers will use nuclear weapons in existential defense. Rightfully in my opinion.

[–] Serdan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm sure the people who are going to be blown up in decades to come will appreciate that at least we held Russia accountable.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Imagine nuking yourself to own the Russians lol

[–] sangle_of_flame@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Russia should be held accountable in both cases.

why is this even meaningful in this case

like now we blame Russia, now what

Ukraine's still fucked to shit

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you wouldn't nuke your own country, right?

[–] Tilted@programming.dev -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You would nuke your enemy, right?

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not a chance.

[–] Tilted@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you would give up your nukes?

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't have any nukes. I'm not a state, nuclear or otherwise.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Yo mama so big shes a state, nuclear or otherwise.