this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
567 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54788 readers
675 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is another post that alerted me of this.

https://lemmy.world/post/13287681

And here is the modlog:

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=ModRemoveCommunity

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 202 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (17 children)

Why are people joining .world to begin with? The entire point of this is to decentralize. Joining the by far largest instance beats the entire purpose.

Join smaller ones like lemmy.one, lemmy.club, lemmings.world, lemmy.zip etc. We might need to start specifically recommending against .world and for general purpose instances like those.

Also, funny how even reddit allows r/Piracy but not .world lol

[–] Blaze@dormi.zone 103 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Sync had Lemmy.world as the default instance to register a new account (might still be the case, I'm not sure). One of the factors for sure.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 95 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So does Voyager, Raccoon, and Eternity. Everything is just defaulting to it and it's infuriating.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Trying to think of any place that didn't/doesn't default to them

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

Maybe boost? I'm not certain as I logged my first account on liftoff

[–] Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The dev really needs to change that then.

Perhaps have a system of selecting randomly from a set of hand-picked general purpose instances at sign-up, where having less people gives it a higher chance of being picked (if it's of at least a certain size of course, to prevent spam etc)

[–] Blaze@dormi.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Agree, but easier said than done

[–] henrikx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm a programmer and it really is quite easy to implement lol

[–] Blaze@dormi.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The issue is not about the implementation, but the filter: which criteria do you use to select instances that are eligible for the pool of instances? I'm genuinely asking because I think it takes some time to have a look on instances for people to make the best choice.

[–] henrikx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

You're overthinking it. Select a few of the popular ones and be done with it

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 69 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Why are people joining .world to begin with?

Because how it works when you first join is very confusing, and why you would choose any particular server is not clear at all.

Also, people want to join something that is bigger and more active because it feels like it would be better (more stable, more content, etc.)

[–] Evoliddaw@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago

In all fairness I applied to 5 Lemmy instances when the Reddit downfall started, including .ca and .world. .ml to date is still the only one to have processed my application. It may have been due to lots of applications at the time but the sheer fact my application is still pending on the other 4 instances leads me to use the one that actually works as opposed to the first one I chose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 55 points 8 months ago

Because they have no basis on which to decide where to go. It's like buying toothpaste but there are hundreds of options, none of which you know anything about, so you get whichever seems most popular. It minimises the risk of ending up with something which is unpopular for good reasons.

[–] SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net 41 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Joining the by far largest instance beats the entire purpose.

There's kind of a tension here between Lemmy's design and what makes most people join social media websites. Most people want the biggest, most centralized website.

[–] halm@leminal.space 6 points 8 months ago

And instead they get the entire network no matter what instance they sign up for. Well, somewhat less than the entire network, apparently...

(I say this knowing full well how many think they're "on the internet" even though they never leave Meta's corporate web)

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 39 points 8 months ago

Because they actually just want to still be on reddit.

[–] gianni@lemmy.ml 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy.world is also notoriously mismanaged and has had dubious privacy issues in the past, such as their Discord situation regarding user messages

[–] Nom@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

dubious privacy issues

They're also federated with threads so I wouldn't be surprised at all. I'm a fool for sticking around in there as long as I have.

[–] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What happened to the messages in their Discord?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 months ago

What I heard was a bot to send in ip from certain instances

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If you join a small instance, the chances are higher that it will a) be poorly maintained and b) fold quicker, forcing you to find another instance to join and re-subscribe to all your communities.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

so long as you're regularly exporting your profile, moving instances isn't a big deal anymore.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The whole point is most people want simplicity, not a chore.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

convenience, freedom, price, safety. Choose 2

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For most users, price and convenience. That's been made very clear over and over again.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Sure, but eventually the lack of freedom and security drives them away when the service enshittifies thoroughly.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

That's what we like to think. Facebook, Google, kinda shows us most users are perfectly happy to continue taking abuse, though

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 months ago

With social media companies, they seem unassailable, until the trust thermocline is breached, and then they collapse all at once.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Emperor 1 points 8 months ago
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

Exporting what, now?

[–] bilb@lem.monster 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I run my own instance that technically does have open registration, but I can't really recommend anyone actually sign up to use it. It's not running on very powerful hardware, and my commitment to keeping it running 24/7 is "as long as it stays convenient and interesting." There are probably many, many of those. But there are a good collection of second and third tier instances now as well, I'm not to worried about .world's popularity so long as they don't do something like switch to a federation allow-list rather than a block list.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If by open registration, you mean without approval, I strongly recommend you add an approval step, due to spam.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm aware of the risk, but so far the captcha seems to have prevented any mass sign-up, and none of the few other existing accounts so far have any activity. That said, since I have no intention to support a user base anymore, I probably should close it anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Also, don't put all your eggs in one basket: diversify, diversify, diversify. Make a main account, but have more on at least one other instance. Instances go down for maintenance, software gets updated, owners change moderation policies, so on. If you can't get to Lemmy through your main, use your secondary.

Personally I use lemmy.sdf.org as my secondary. It's run by a bunch of retro-enthusiast Unix nerds who more care about the functionality of the tech than anything else. No blocked communities there, and AFAIK they haven't defederated from any instance outside of ones that were hacked/compromised. That does not mean you can just go there and be a shitbird though, they do have standards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Everyone should leave that instance, the admin and the mods on that instance are big time thought police and will find excuses in their vague rules to delete your posts and eventually ban you if your views go against the grain.

[–] Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 8 months ago

Banning users with certain "opinions" isn't a bad thing on its own, but on .world that grain seems to be the corporate-bootlicking grain of Reddit.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago

Also, funny how even reddit allows r/Piracy but not .world lol

Imagine being even more of a corporate simp that Reddit lmao

[–] somethingchameleon@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think it's fine to have a main instance, as long as that main instance isn't gung-ho about censorship like lemmy.world has become.

Although I definitely agree with recommending against joining lemmy.world.

Such a shitty decision by biased mods and useful idiots. They deserve to lose power as a result.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

My instance is somewhat small so I'm not guilty :D

[–] rambaroo@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't disagree at all but I can kind of understand why a lemmy instance would block piracy communities. Reddit has many millions of dollars and a squad of lawyers to back them up, lemmy admins don't.

[–] ellabella@beehaw.org 3 points 8 months ago

Lemmy is confusing enough for people who are not used to its idea. Everybody new and with FOMO immediately went for the bigger instances.

load more comments (1 replies)