this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
716 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
4723 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
716
Deep space experts prove Elon Musk's Starlink is interfering in scientific work (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Scientists, looking deep into space, have long voiced their concerns that satellites are encroaching on their ability to study the cosmos.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I strongly dislike Elon Musk but Starlink is a net win, and science can and must evolve to overcome these sorts of challenges. Nearby space is only going to get more crowded

[–] ilickfrogs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have to agree here. I think a temporary compromise could be reducing the constellation size, spread out the dishes and reduce throughput. The accessibility Starlink offers is a 11/10 win for the world. But the bandwidth and size should come after we have better mitigation for Kessler Syndrome and inference with observing the universe. Alternatively, lets slap some big fuckin' telescopes on the moon and call it a day!