this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
275 points (96.9% liked)

Star Trek

10596 readers
126 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-07 LD 5x04 "A Farewell to Farms"
11-14 LD 5x05 "Starbase 80?!"
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angels"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lwaxana@startrek.website 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The show has one non-binary character and a gay couple and suddenly they’re relying on “cultural hot topics”.

the gay men brushed their teeth wont somebody think of the children

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

No, it's the modern, basic portrayal of those characters and their issues that's the problem.

Star Trek is supposed to reflect on human problems and foibles with allegory. Not just slap you across the face with, "see, gays are normal, too!" Yes, we watch Star Trek. We know. Make it more interesting with an allegory tied to a other characters that aren't supposed to be professional officers from a species that's prescribed as already past these issues.

By putting so much basic and direct human drama in STD, they bastardized the entire bluepeint of the show.

[–] Lwaxana@startrek.website 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

im not sure how one is slapped across the face with normalcy but if you're saying discovery didnt go far enough with the barely-disguised left wing messaging we usually see in star trek i agree wholeheartedly

[–] T156@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

im not sure how one is slapped across the face with normalcy but if you’re saying discovery didnt go far enough with the barely-disguised left wing messaging we usually see in star trek i agree wholeheartedly

In fairness, that messaging has taken rather a back seat ever since Trek became big, probably because the networks see it as a cash cow, and no longer give it liberty to take the same risks.

DS9 only got as far as they did pushing the boundary because Voyager had most of the attention, for example.

You don't really see any new Trek show pushing the boundary quite like TOS did back in the day, to the point where it was very nearly cancelled outright due to the outrage it produced. Roddenberry even wanted to add an LGBT character to it at some point, but it was shot down by the other producers. Compared to TOS, Discovery's representation and messaging is almost contemporary, with relatively little boundary-pushing.

Compare to that to the Orville, which doesn't have that baggage by virtue of being new, and relatively unknown, so they can get away with more on-the-nose messaging a good bit more without getting into trouble. There's no established IP and format that the network would prefer that they keep to, or stay uncontroversial so it's still palatable to wider audiences.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I mean, yea, basically. They didn't let the concepts steep enough so the allegory took back stage to the simplified moralizing.

I'm not necessarily against any general angle they took, it just didn't really do the star trek intellectual thing where they're actually competent professional adults dealing with something. The general mood of the writing is just ... too straight forward plain Hollywood. Sure, Star Trek has its TV schlock, but it was that angle of at least trying to make everyone logic-first adults that made it great.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, modern basic issues like being kidnapped into a multiversal network of spores and finding your murdered partner creeping in the wings destroying everything he touches.

Mondays, amirite?

Any "mundane" problems they faced were faced by most of the crew at some point, yet you're only complaining about non-cishets being "normal." You're not very good at masking your bigotry.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Those are specific details, not general nature of writing. I'm talking about analysis of the writing style, not how scifi it is.