this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
3293 points (87.4% liked)

Meta (lemm.ee)

3592 readers
2 users here now

lemm.ee Meta

This is a community for discussion about this particular Lemmy instance.

News and updates about lemm.ee will be posted here, so if that's something that interests you, make sure to subscribe!


Rules:


If you're a Discord user, you can also join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/XM9nZwUn9K

Discord is only a back-up channel, !meta@lemm.ee will always be the main place for lemm.ee communications.


If you need help with anything, please post in !support instead.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Context

There have been a lot of posts and comments recently about Facebook entering the fediverse, and how different instances will handle it. Many people have asked me to commit to pre-emptively defederating from Threads before they even implement ActivityPub.

The lemm.ee federation policy states that it's not a goal for lemm.ee to curate content for our users, but we will certainly defederate any server which aims to systematically break our rules. I want to point out here that Facebook makes essentially all of its money from advertising, and lemm.ee has a no advertising rule - basically, Facebook has a built-in financial incentive to break our rules. ActivityPub has no protections against advertising, so it's likely we will end up having to eventually defederate from Threads just for this reason alone.

However, I would still like to get a feel for how many people in our instance are actually excited for potential federation with Threads. While personally I feel that any theoretical pros are by far outweighed by cons, I do want to use this opportunity to see how much of the community disagrees with me. I am not intending to run this instance as a democracy (sorry if anybody is disappointed by that), but I would still like to have a clear picture of user feedback for potentially major decisions such as this one. This is why I am asking every user who wants lemm.ee to federate with Facebook to please downvote this post.


Here are some reasons why I personally believe that Threads will have a negative effect on the fediverse

  • As mentioned above, Facebook is completely driven by ad revenue. There is nothing stopping them from sending out ads as posts/comments with artificially inflated scores, which would ensure that their ads end up on the "all" page of federated servers.
  • Threads already has more users than all Lemmy instances combined. Even if their algorithms don't apply to the rest of the fediverse directly, they can still completely dictate what the "all" page will look like for all instances by simply controlling what their own users see and vote on.
  • Moderation does not seem to be a priority for Threads so far, meaning that they would create massive moderation workloads for smaller instances.
  • In general, Facebook has shown countless times that they don't have their users best interests in mind. They view users as something to exploit for revenue. There are probably ways they are already thinking about hurting the fediverse that we can't even imagine yet.

By the way, we're not really in any rush today with our decision regarding federation

  • Threads does not have ActivityPub support yet today
  • Even if they add ActivityPub support, their UX is geared towards Mastodon-like usage - it seems unlikely that there would ever be proper interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • We don't really know what to defederate from - it's completely possible that "threads.net" will not be their ActivityPub domain at all.

So go ahead and downvote if you feel defederation would be a mistake, and feel free to share your thoughts in the comments! It would be super helpful to me if folks who are in favor of federating with Threads could leave a comment explaining their reasoning.


Update:

By now, it's clear that there is a group of users who are in favor of federating with Threads. The breakdown is like this (based on downvotes):

  • lemm.ee users: 136 in favor of federating with Threads
  • Others: 288 in favor of federating with Threads

While it seems to be a minority, it's still quite a few users. There is no way to please all users in this situation - any decision I make will certainly inconvenience some of you, and I apologize for that.

A big thanks to everybody who has shared opinions and arguments in comments so far. I think there are several well written comments that have been unfairly downvoted, but I have personally read all comments and tried to respond to several as well. I will keep reading them as they come in.

The main facts I am working with right now are as follows:

  • The majority of lemm.ee users are strongly opposed to immediately federating with Threads
  • Facebook has a proven track record of exploiting users (and a built-in financial incentive to do so)
  • We currently lack proper federation/moderation tools to allow us to properly handle rule breaking content from Facebook

Considering all of the above, I believe the initial approach for lemm.ee should be to defederate Threads, and then monitor the situation for a period of time to determine if federating with them in the future is a realistic option

In order to federate with them, the following conditions would need to be fulfilled:

  • There needs to be actual interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • Threads needs to prove that they are not flooding instances with rule-breaking content (mainly ads and bigotry for lemm.ee)
  • There needs to be a mechanism to prevent feed manipulation by Threads algorithms (potentially this means discarding all incoming votes from Threads)

Note: this is an initial list, subject to change as we learn more about Threads.

Again, I realize this approach won't please everybody, but I really believe it's the best approach on a whole for now. Please feel free to keep adding comments and keep the discussion going if you think there is something I have not considered.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HolyFriedFish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Someone posted a link to a Mastodon post (edit: found the post) from the admins at lemmy.world which basically stated that they would take a "wait and see" approach. I can't find the post right this moment but I'll keep looking. In any case, it seems lemmy.world will not be defederating, at least until Meta does something bad enough, whatever that may be.

I also saw a post from vlemmy.net about having to defederate from another instance, and the whole post was extremely transparent and well put together. I suspect they will not be defederating from Meta, as it seems that they don't want to defederate from anyone, barring laws being broken. With that said, they seem to be based in Ireland and I'm not sure whether they'll have to defederate from Threads for legal reasons or not.

~~There was a comment somewhere that had a list of servers that had already taken the stance of federating when possible, had not taken a stance at all, and had preemptively defederated. I'll see if I can find that one for you, as well.~~ I misremembered, it was a list of Mastodon servers, not Lemmy.

I'm not sure if this is helpful, but I hope it at least points you in the right general direction! I'm in kind of the opposite boat from you - I am disappointed that lemmy.world will be federation with Threads, so now I'm poking around to find someplace that suits me better. It can be challenging figuring out where instances stand!

[–] misk@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately vlemmy also seems to be leaning towards blocking Meta: https://vlemmy.net/comment/639289

[edit]

In the light of the downvotes:

Is your email server refusing connections from Google because you're worried about SMTP being taken over by evil corporations?

I mean, if you do then cool. I want to email my grandma sometimes so I look for one that doesn't.

[–] sunaurus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry about the downvotes, I think I may have caused people to be very trigger-happy with downvotes by asking for downvotes on the main post 😅 I'm seeing a lot of downvotes on quite high quality comments here.

Regarding the e-mail example, I do want to refute it a bit:

E-mail providers (including Google) are in fact notorious for how strictly they block other servers. This is especially true for any SMTP servers which focus on sending ads - if you set up an SMTP server which aims to earn profit by sending out ads to normal users who haven't asked for any ads, major providers will very quickly blocklist your server and not deliver anything sent from you.

While it's true that Threads is not sending out ads yet, you just need to look at how Facebook and Instagram do ads already, and how basically all of their revenue comes from selling ads - it would be very unexpected for me if ads were not their core business model for Threads as well.

[–] misk@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, it's healthy to block scammers. I was asking specifically if there's an instance of an internet protocol where non-commercial entities decide to block commercial ones like here. Like refuse interoperability with Hotmail / outlook.com because Microsoft is nasty. That's what's being proposed by many here.

Threads is already massive, they're happy with monetising their own users and likely do Activity Pub to appease EU regulators.