this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
-24 points (12.5% liked)

privatelife - privacy, security, freedom advocacy

1558 readers
1 users here now

This community is meant to advocate privacy, security and freedom in an concise manner, free of prejudice bias, free of politics, free of cultist thoughts.

Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say. - Edward Snowden

Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/privatelife

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#privatelife:matrix.org

Telegram: https://t.me/r_privatelife

READ THE RULES

  1. Opinions are welcome, facts more so. Attack arguments, not people. Hating, baiting, trolling, flaming will be dealt with strictly.

  2. Discuss closed source software with caution. Advocating for it strongly (cult brigading) can be treated as violation of this rule.

  3. Editing titles of article links is strictly prohibited, unless and until the summarisation remains accurate to the context of the article or paper. Such link post will be removed without questioning.

  4. Targeting of any country, person or nation is strictly prohibited without valid reasoning. Evidence if not presented against the specific company/corporation/individual will be treated as personal attack and/or hate speech. This will result in a warning, then ban system.

  5. NO PERMA BANS! Ban system will work as follows:

1 day --> 3 day --> 1 week --> 2 weeks --> 3 weeks --> 1 month --> 3 months --> 6 months

Severity of the ban system will be dealt with based on degree of violation and circumstances.

  1. NO FACT-LESS EVIDENCES, NO FALSE RHETORIC Evidence has to be credible. The onus of this lies on the claimant. The same applies on the user who questions proven evidence. Violation of this rule will be dealt with strictly.

  2. Copycat posts serve to litter the community, increasing quantity and decreasing quality of posts. As such, posts will be removed. Repeated attempts will receive warning.


Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
-24
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by scratchandgame@lemmy.ml to c/privatelife@lemmy.ml
 

People here's take about why free software ("open source") should be preferred, in my opinion (basically the OpenBSD's opinion) is flawed.

You said "open source" is "good" because it permits having eyes on ("auditing") and make sure there isn't malware.

This is NOT the most important benefit. But it is flawed because, you guys don't even have the knowledge to do coding. You guys are activist/"journalists" working for CIA. So you cannot audit the software yourselves.

Or "open source" but with a bad code style, how can you make sure the code doesn't have backdoors? But I think hilarious journalists that is only smart enough to post fake news about how down is the Russia and China economy can't even write bad code.

"open source" is good, firstly, because it permits auditing the source code and find the bugs, replace flawed/bad code with safer alternative (for example, the advantage of an open-source C software when porting to OpenBSD is they can replace every occurrence of strcat/strcpy with safer strlcat/strlcpy), sandbox it (on OpenBSD, with pledge and unveil), do privileges separation and revocation, etc.

And I think "you can make sure there isn't malware/backdoors" is the second benefit, NEVER THE FIRST.

Conclusion: Do not blindly trust what is "open source" when you can't even do code auditing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

@loudWaterHombre@lemmy.dbzer0.com or @loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com can audit for you.

Seriously, that’s what you’re missing. Bob the non-coder can trust Microsoft not to plant spyware in MS products, or Bob can trust some portion of the public (limited to ~8 billion people) to audit the code. It’s easier to trust the public than it is to trust a corporation. It’s not just about quantity of eyes, but having eyes that are more aligned with your interests.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry if I made the guy question his life so hard, he deleted his comments.

You summoned me for auditing code? Call me crazy but I'm in, I would actually do it and hand out free threat level and security analysis for you specific use-case / system.

I've been in the industry for 20+ years.

[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sounds good.. will be interesting to see if @scratchandgame@lemmy.ml takes you up on the offer!

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] diyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hopefully he asks you to audit a tool you might enjoy using or contributing to.

That would be indeed awesome.

He actually did not delete his post.

hey I have never deleted any comment

perhaps I'm banned.

In my shallow thought privacy communities nowadays can only whine when company do something harm their privacy. Few like you are much better, and should escape that community or do something to actually revise it.

Your data is not private when you put on other's hard drive. I thought europes are much well-educated than Vietnamese here... but they mostly can't doubt on privacy policy. If I doubt, they call that conspiracy theories and I'm banned. I only think they are so naive. This is just a surprise for me.

feel free to public this message