this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
57 points (91.3% liked)

US News

2045 readers
119 users here now

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I really don't think there's a huge amount of difference in policy because ultimately it's all driven by the permanent bureaucracy. For example, Nuland served under Bush, Obama, then Biden. She doesn't care which party is in charge. Meanwhile, the current admin has probably gotten US closer to a war with Iran than it's ever been. I agree that a lot of it is happenstance, but currently neocons are gravitating towards the dem party.

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

the current admin has probably gotten US closer to a war with Iran than it’s ever been

...under Trump, the U.S. assassinated an Iranian war hero on a diplomatic mission, then Iran attacked a U.S. base in retaliation. Those are real acts of war from both sides. Apparently further escalation was a matter of how long John Bolton could stay in the same room as Trump. You say neocons are gravitating towards Democrats; they're actually right there in Republican administrations stoking the fire of an already active situation.

I agree 70-80% is the same. But that last chunk is significant -- almost no lib will even admit the U.S. is an empire; meanwhile you have Eric Price openly calling for the U.S. to serve as an empire and the 2008 Republican presidential nominee saying "100 years in Iraq."

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue that that current level of escalation is far beyond Soleimani assassination. We just narrowly avoided US doing a strike directly in Iran, and that might still happen if things keep going the way they are. Libs won't admit to running an empire, but there's no correlation between what libs say and what libs do. I think the fact that people see libs as being more tame is precisely why they're able to get away with more.

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I really can't see the "Democrats are actually worse" argument when the two most relevant wars -- Iraq and Afghanistan -- were both started by Republicans, and when Republicans committed (not almost committed, not came close to committing) an act of war against Iran just a few years ago.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 months ago

As I said, I don't think there's any major difference between the two parties. Importantly, all the actual decisions are made by the permanent bureaucracy. The party that's in charge has little influence over these decisions in the grand scheme of things.