this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
721 points (97.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53958 readers
1090 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While we can be pretty confident that Reddit has its own motivations (i.e. self-interest) for fighting these lawsuits, this is still a good news story for pirates.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] onion@feddit.de -3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Yes but you commented on a global website, so your previous generalist statement definetly doesn't apply to everyone reading it :)

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

It's a US site and a US court.

US law is the only thing relevant to the case being discussed.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Then share your local law. Don't be pissy that Americans are clarifying for other Americans.

[–] wick@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

America is such a small country though, no one would assume anything said online is directed at it's miniscule population without an explicit reference.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

Whoops, your bias is showing.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thats why I stated at the top that more specifically there is no "US Federal law..."

[–] wick@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And that's why they specifically referred to "your previous generalist statement" where you didn't do that.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago

Listen, they either reply to the comment they wanted to reply to, or they did it wrong. They replied to the comment that prefaced with a statement about US Law in particular. It should be clear to them that the statement applies to US Law.