this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
33 points (90.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43816 readers
1193 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

Those campy villains were amazing though - Ledger was an amazing Joker but so was Nicholson and so was Hamill... Carrey as the riddler was also amazing!

Honestly I think part of the appeal of Batman now is that the characters are archetypes and each portrayal shows how the universe might unfold slightly differently based on the specific personality traits involved. Will we have a lone ronin Joker like Ledger? Will it be Nicholson's charismatic mafioso? Phoenix's debilitated martyr? Hamill's obsessed moralizing sadist?

Each one shows an interesting twist on the central character and gives a fresh story that, while great on it's own, really shines when viewed through contrast.

Nicholson and Ledger were supremely competent agents of destruction - Hamill and Romero seemed entirely focused on their arch to the point of their own destruction - meanwhile Phoenix was utterly incompetent and gained notoriety only because he was a useful idiot latched on to by a society in deep pain (@see the rise of right wing dictators).

It's fucking awesome. Batman is essentially new media's Arthurian Cycle.