this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
91 points (100.0% liked)

Pathfinder 2e General Discussion

7 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jaarsh119@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anyone know what's the meaning of the spell schools one?

[–] renaissancegamer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The 8 spell schools are very D&D so they have to go in the Remaster. For specialist wizards, they'll instead have actual schools that they studied at, with various themes like the "School of Battle Magic", with a predefined list of spells they specialise in.

[–] treed@lemmy.zenithia.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spell schools were invented for Dragonlance in the lead up to the 2e era. The idea of an Illusionist is probably demonstrable enough outside of D&D, but the rest are pure TSR lore.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Other fantasy worlds slice up magic differently. I personally would like to see the concept of magic schools stick around in some form but the D&D schools always felt a bit arbitrary in their divisions.

I feel like necromancy could definitely be split up into "actual NECROmancy" and "Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise!"

Enchantment also feels like it could stay, though maybe with a different name; although realistically it's already kinda covered by the [Mental] trait. Anything that previously referred to "enchantment spells" could be changed to refer to "mental spells"

Abjuration, Conjuration, Transmutation, and Evocation were always the ones that felt the weakest in terms of having well-defined boundaries.

[–] treed@lemmy.zenithia.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree that the schools always felt a little arbitrary. Abjuration in particular always felt kinda weak to me, even in concept.

I think they could probably just leave it to a potentially open-ended set of traits. Some could even have multiple, which helps with the arbitrariness. Characters could specialize in spells that have particular traits.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. My two cents is also that "Glamour" would be a way better word for Illusions, but it sounds like that won't be changing

[–] treed@lemmy.zenithia.net 3 points 1 year ago

It would depend on the type of illusion for me, but yeah Glamour could absolutely be a trait that someone could specialize in.