this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
204 points (97.2% liked)

Open Source

31133 readers
324 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
kevincox@lemmy.ml
CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml
204
The Ladybird browser project (ladybird.dev)
submitted 9 months ago by Ninjazzon@infosec.pub to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Ladybird is an ongoing project to build an independent web browser from scratch.

It is being developed as part of the SerenityOS/serenity project on GitHub.

There are no downloadable binaries yet, as the project is still very unstable. You can follow the build instructions to build it for yourself.

This page is not fancy because we are focusing on building the browser. :^)

Since Ladybird is part of the SerenityOS project, development is coordinated on the SerenityOS discord server.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

To be honest, I think the internet is in desperate need of an alternative to the Chrome/Mozilla/Safari trio. Why can I can no longer get a browser that doesn't shove ads in my face and/or track my every move?

I know this isn't being designed as a browser for everyone. But I'm pleased to see making a web browser isn't an un-enterable area yet.

[–] risencode@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What's wrong with Mozilla?

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Forces ads in my face via Firefox. Sometimes promotes commercial control of the internet. Is borderline for-profit at this stage with all the moneygrubbing and issues that comes with.

Don't get me wrong, they're the best of the lot by a long long way, but they're still problematic.

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What? Where? I haven't seen an ad in Firefox since Carter was president.

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Install Firefox with default settings > Look at your new tab page. They're all sponsored ads.

Firefox on mobile collects data and sends it off for marketing purposes, this can't be turned off.

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh my gosh, that's messed up. And you can't even turn it off??!?

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Servo's looking good too.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

Servo has been the most exciting one to me for a while. Seems like one of the best foundations for a new browser.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

he internet is in desperate need of an alternative to the Chrome/Mozilla/Safari trio.

No it's not. You have lots and lots of different browsers. Do we need another browser engine? Also not. They all do the same thing so while it's good to have some competition we definitely don't need yet another one.

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

We essentially have three different browsers, that definitively isn't "lots and lots". Every year they get together and agree on what measures can be foisted upon all users with or without their support. The rest are very little more than reskins of each other.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so what do you want your 4th, new browser to do differently? What's so different about it that you can't build it on top of Gecko?

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's not about a lack of features.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What is it about then? Rendering HTML and CSS in a new, fun way?

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No? I've already said what it's about, and I'm not eager to repeat myself 'cause I feel vague meanyness.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 1 points 9 months ago

What you said (if I understand you correctly, you didn't give any examples) boils down to breaking standards established by the current browsers. The standards that web developers and servers universally follow. If you want to build browser that will not follow standards you might just as well render HTML in non-standars ways. Most pages will not work anyway.