this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
696 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A spokesperson for the Russian government clarified that it has rejected requests to interview Vladimir Putin from reputable media outlets

The Kremlin’s first public response to Tucker Carlson’s announcement that he’s landed an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin was to fact-check the former Fox News host.

On Wednesday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov confirmed that Carlson had indeed interviewed Putin, but took issue with Carlson’s claim that “not a single Western journalist has bothered” to interview Russia’s president throughout the nation’s war with Ukraine, which has raged for more than two years.

...

Putin’s refusal to sit down with most Western media outlets likely has less to do with accusations of bias so much as an unwillingness to be subjected to legitimate scrutiny of his government. Russia has been accused of committing atrocities and war crimes in its offensive against Ukraine, including the unlawful executions of civilians. Putin’s government is also infamous for its frequent detainment of political rivals and critics, as well as the cloud of mysterious deaths and poisonings of those in his orbit.

Whether Carlson will question Putin on any of these matters remains to be seen. The former Fox News host’s history of granting softball interviews to controversial influencers, political figures, and authoritarian leaders, indicates this is unlikely. Given everything we know about Putin’s propaganda machine, it’s clear that in Carlson, the Russian government sees a safe opportunity to broadcast its carefully crafted messaging to American viewers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Latino here. 93% of us polled either dislike, find stupid, or are not interested in the English language usage of the word "Latinx." It's use is a misunderstanding of the basic functional parts of the Spanish language.

Its usage presumes some sort of malicious gendering of words, however most languages, and in particular, Latin based languages like Spanish, French, Italian, and Portuguese, all use gendering.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Wait — you don’t like to be told by a bunch of entitled assholes what to call yourself?

[–] nvvp@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

While only a small percentage prefer latinx, most don't care. You're misreading or misrepresenting the poll.

The majority (57%) said that a choice among the labels "Hispanic," "Latino," "Latinx" or another term didn't matter to them, while another 23% preferred "Hispanic" and 15% preferred "Latino."

https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/388532/controversy-term-latinx-public-opinion-context.aspx

[–] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

All of it is silly. None of you speak Latin

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Your mistake here is confounding the name of a language with the name of a culture.

[–] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Aside from Spanish and Portuguese language influences, what makes Central and South American cultures Latin?

[–] Jaderick@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I thought Latinx was part of a movement that would explicitly remove gendering of words from languages like Spanish, French, and German. I thinks it’s by design, but unpopular

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Well if they're going to do it by replacing everything with x, they're going to have to talk to Elon...

[–] LennethAegis@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've also heard "Latine" used, how is that one doing in hispanic culture? I'm hispanic myself, but have lived mostly separate from the culture, so I'm unfamiliar if the terms get used or not.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

That's a different thing altogether. Its origins are in Spanish and attempt to do the same as "they/them" and is a attempt to be inclusive of gender fluidity.

Latinx is an entitled American white invention.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 7 months ago

I love how responses to this change from "ask someone from Latin America" to "you dont know as much as I do" when you don't back them up.

They go from revering you until you appear, to discounting your experience when you do.