this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
288 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59345 readers
5383 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (2 children)

A Polaroid is the best representation that can be made of a scene on Polaroid photo film. The lens, the paper, and other factors will always make the representation, to a degree, not real. That was the Samsung exec's point. It's a little disingenuous, though. The discussion shouldn't be about "real" vs "fake" it should be about "faithful" vs "misleading".

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

So what’s an eyeball then?

Our perception of reality isn’t real, it’s just light hitting a lens and being decoded by an organic computer.

Or to paraphrase the philosopher Jaden Smith: How Can Cameras Be Real If Our Eyes Aren't Real

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Add to that the fact that our brains run software that doesn't even try to faithfully store images and you have part of the reason that photos are, currently, more reliable than eye witnesses. That may be changing though.

Our brains are natural intelligence and perform natural learning. The results are even less reliable, predictable, and repeatable than the results provided by artificial intelligence.

[–] Vub@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Excellent to-the-point comment!

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Samsung Boss said:

As soon as you have sensors to capture something, you reproduce [what you’re seeing], and it doesn’t mean anything. There is no real picture.

A Polaroid photograph is a real picture, in the sense that it exists as a single, definitive, physical thing. Whether what it shows is real is a different question, though.