Lemmy

12531 readers

21 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

nutomic@lemmy.ml

(How) Does Lemmy prevent brigading and other vote manipulation? (feddit.de)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by CaptainBlagbird@feddit.de to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Unidan could just create an account on multiple instances and vote for his posts/comments with all these accounts. That way his content would gain more attention than those of sincere users.

In case of malicious bots (like those annoying bootleg bots on reddit), it might even be profitable for them to create their own instance(s) just for that purpose.

Is there a mechanism to prevent that? (other than user/instance banning and the introduction question on user creation)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rowdy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh - I had not even considered downvotes in other instances... Yeah that seems problematic. Maybe rather than defederating downvotes, there could be a way to differentiate between local and global up/downvotes.

[–] CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This sounds interesting. I see two possibilities for that:

Let downvotes from external users be less effective
Display up/down ratio twice, once from local votes and once from external votes; plus only have the local ones affect sorting

Actually when I think about it, a combination of both would also be possible.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Just let each instance/community decide its own policy. People will naturally flock to whichever policy works out.

[–] jujitsudo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Nice idea.

Global and local votes is an interesting idea, reflective of echo chamber vs general consensus.

Not sure how effective it would be in addressing the point raised by OP, but it might have value in its own right.