this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
722 points (97.6% liked)

Gaming

3089 readers
526 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blackmist 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

PS2 graphics were pretty on point. Upscale to a modern resolution, many of them still look decent now.

Xbox 360 era we got a lot of normal maps added (so models looked a lot more complex than they were).

PS4 added physically based rendering (ability to make parts of models look shiny without needing to separate them).

And the new shit is ray tracing, which PS5 isn't really powerful enough to do, but honestly neither are most affordable PCs. We get nicer lighting at least, but we'll still be on the old render paths for a while yet.

You still get improvements over time, but nothing is really going to compare to PS1 to PS2.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Games have gotten prettier, no argument, but I still feel like we're playing the same games we were playing 20 years ago just with slight QOL improvements.

[–] Blackmist 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I feel like everything we have now could have been done on the PS3 and Xbox 360. At least gameplay wise. Before that they were quite limited in terms of RAM. The big open world games probably couldn't have been done prior to that gen. Stuff like Assassin's Creed 2 or Far Cry 3 wouldn't have been possible at all on PS2, I feel.

The closest they had was GTA SA which had huge nearly empty areas to hide the loading of the main city areas.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

I'm just going to butt in and say that Far Cry 3 is the most ridiculously perfectly optimised game I've ever played. I managed to get it running on internal graphics of an old laptop in 800x600 resolution with potato settings and it was genuinely still enjoyable. I think I played through it halfway like that before I got my pc back.