this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
202 points (84.1% liked)
Asklemmy
43945 readers
792 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm in a similar place to you career-wise. Personally, I'm not concerned about becoming just a "debugger." What I'm expecting this job to look like in a few years is to be more like "the same as now, except I've got a completely free team of "interns" that do all the menial stuff for me. Every human programmer will become a lead programmer, deciding what stuff our AIs do for us and putting it all together into the finished product.
Maybe a few years further along the AI assistants will be good enough to handle that stuff better than we do as well. At that point we stop being lead programmers and we all become programming directors.
So think of it like a promotion, perhaps.
Why would there be a team of AIs in this scenario under the human, instead of just one AI entity.
The role of the human is to tell the AI what it's supposed to do. If you're worried about AI that's sophisticated enough to be completely self-directed then you're worrying about AGI, which will be so world-changing that piddly little concerns such as "what about my job?" Are pretty trivial.
No, I meant keeping the human directing things but they could do it with one AI under them
Well yes, then. That's what I said. You'd be a programmer who had free underlings doing whatever grunt work you directed them to.
Or are you questioning my use of the term "team" for the AIs? LLMs are specialized in various ways, you'd likely want to have multiple ones that handle different tasks.
Yeah I meant the team part. Learnt something new, I thought all AI was more or less equal!