this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
284 points (94.1% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2144 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aew360@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Haley isn’t getting elected. She has virtually no path towards the GOP nomination. If she did, MAGATs aren’t going to vote for her unless he was on the ballot, and then if she did put him on the ballot, she’ll lose the moderate votes.

Trump has a chance to cause chaos by losing another general election. He could also do even more damage by winning another general election. Haley, if she somehow won the primary and general, would be so much less destructive.

So yeah, voting for Haley in the primary is the fucking move and it’s why I didn’t vote for Biden in the SC primary.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Nikki Haley's Sudden Wealth Rooted in Weapons Industry, Pro-War Advocacy Network.

The former U.N. ambassador went from virtually no savings in 2017 to a small fortune in part from defense contracting and war advocacy ties.

https://www.leefang.com/p/nikki-haleys-sudden-wealth-rooted

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Look, no Democrat is saying she'd be great or even close to being better than Biden.

But she'd certainly be better than Trump. And if she can split the Republican votes in the general election, even better.

[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

SHE HAS THE SAME FASCIST POLICY POSITIONS AS TRUMP. THEY'RE EFFECTIVELY THE SAME CANDIDATE

[–] TwentySeven@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

When Haley tries to overthrow the government, I'll say she's as bad as Trump. Until that happens, I say Trump is worse.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No, she wouldn't be. Trump at least has value from an accelerationist POV, Haley's going to do all things Trump would but as less of a publicly shitposting moron.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don’t care if she sucks. She won’t beat Trump in the end. The longer she stays in the race, the more angry he’s gonna get at his own party

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People said the exact same shit about trump in 2016 and tried to do the same meta gaming shit you're trying to do, and look how that turned out. Ffs just admit you don't know what the fuck you're doing and vote like a normal person instead of big braining us into fascism again

[–] aew360@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lmfao. Haley won’t be a fascist. The fascist will be a fascist. You don’t have to pretend like you know what you’re talking about

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Liberals, the only people who will vote and run ads for the far right and then blame everyone else when democrats lose the election 🙃

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

She wins the primary if SCOTUS rules that Trump is an insurrectionist, and she polls well against Biden precisely because she appeals to "enlightened centrists."

The question is not whether Trump should be barred as insurrectionist. The question is what candidate the leash holders of certain Justices want.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

I have a very hard time seeing Trump supporters coming around to vote for her when he’s painted her as a part of the deep state

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Jesus Christ when are you gonna learn that these stupid 4d chess moves don't fucking work? You're gonna be literally supporting republicans, and when that gets a republican in office again you're probably gonna blame 3rd party voters and leftists and young people and Russia and literally everyone other than yourself for republicans winning. This shit backfires all the time, don't fuck us all over with this "big brain" bullshit again please

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 0 points 9 months ago

seriously. i have a policy that i only vote for someone if i want them to have the office (i know, i'm a fucking lunatic).