8
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)
College Football
837 readers
14 users here now
A community to discuss college football.
Check out our other sports communities!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Good. This is going to go down as potentially the least enjoyable era of college football, but it's probably the most important to actually get D1 CFB up to the depressingly low moral standards of the National Football League.
It's all a big cultural and economic mess, but I think eventually, we will end up with a de facto collective bargaining setup -- whether that's laws, competitive necessities, a trade organization, or a formal league -- that gets around the clear abuse of the schools' market position (propped up by the NFL's 3-year rule and roster limits). A collectively bargained solution would probably still involve legal fictions and quaint absurdities like enrolling the players as students, but honestly that's fine by me. These are obviously "non traditional" students even by the kindest measure, and they may actually do better academically with access to scholarships or tuition waivers that can be a negotiated benefit and potentially continue past their "competitive usefulness".
The non-revenue sports could be a sticking point, because schools are bastards and will probably want to cut them if the football money is halved or whatever. I don't know what to do about it exactly, but the marginal cost of an athletic scholarship itself is nowhere near the sticker price, yet for the vast majority of student athletes it will be at or above the market rate for their athletic services. If the new system simply retains the programs and scholarships, then investment in facilities and coaching is less concerning. I will admit to a certain ambivalence about heavy investment in intercollegiate athletics where the alumni and other stakeholders don't seem overly concerned about the results. Our system of running so many top-end developmental sporting tiers through our universities is kludgy and antiquated and, frankly, kind of stupid.
As a non revenue athlete and a cfb fan, the non revenue question is incredibly tricky. How do we implement a fair standard that prevents swimming, tennis, golf, archery etc. not be sacrificed to the cfb gods? Title ix is a great example of how NOT to guarantee that fair means a future for every team and there's no real good example as far as I'm aware. As much as I love cfb, it's continued expansion cannot be allowed to jeopardize the future of other collegiate sports. I think there is continued value in sports to academic institutions. Both for the institution as advertising and for athletes as sports repeatedly prove to be beneficial for cognitive development (outside of tbis of course). Plus I think it's a great way to train sports medicine majors, a field that will hopefully continue to have some level of demand until we upload our collective conscious into the cloud. cfb and cbb aren't going anywhere anytime soon in the meantime and we should continue to leverage that for our other collegiate programing, especially non revenue sports. But I also don't have a solution