this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
61 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43947 readers
672 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm pretty open to all varieties as long as the narrators voice isn't terrible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You need to retune your compass because, my friend, you are completely out of touch with reality. Your argument boils down to "well he's not a serial killer rapist pedophile" which is not even remotely an acceptable argument to be making. Please rethink your path.

[–] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Zizek has criticisms, but I am not "cancelling" his great past works. Learning to absorb the good and throwing away the bad is true knowledge enlightenment. Throwing out baby with bathwater has never resulted in a net benefit. And I believe in getting more knowledge, as a digital data archivist/curator.

There is nothing that does a better job on ideology (2012) and cinema (2006) than Zizek's works. His expertise on psychoanalysis, ideology critique, media literacy and political academia is a rare deadly combination.

Have a more open mind. Do not just put a political gas mask on your brain. It is unhealthy. But then, I do not care about appeasing leftist circles, and despise liberals and rightists, so I am pretty alone on the path I walk. So you can choose to play safe, I take risks for knowledge.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I am going to continue my hardline stance against people who wield fascism because every time I laxed up on that stance, it fucked me over. Yes that means we're going to be put at odds, that's just the way things are. I shot my shot but you're all in, so whatever. I'm moving on.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I usually refer Žižek appreciators to Gabriel Rockhill: Capitalism’s Court Jester: Slavoj Žižek

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I'll save this message for the next time I need it, thanks a ton.

[–] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

I am a very determined idiot. It takes a bit of crazy to use low or no filters while absorbing knowledge, while not going crazy or burning your brain out or become a bad person. Not sure there is a playbook to train yourself to be like this, other than exposing yourself to too much knowledge, so I consider it a natural gift. Humans are risk averse anyway... maybe I am not human lol. On very rare occasions I feel the brain burnout but it is an acceptable cost.