Technology

59588 readers

3987 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

576

The floppy disk refused to die in Japan - laws that forced the continued use of floppies have finally hit the chopping block (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

10 to one they weren't, look how oddly this article is phrased. I'd guess there was a rule government offices had to accept floppy discs, have the equipment to read them, but the clients weren't actually submitting that way anymore.

[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Like, the first paragraph explains.

Until last week there were about 1,900 official governmental application procedures that stipulated businesses must submit floppies or CD-ROMs (specifically) containing supplementary data.

Not "the government had to accept them", but "businesses were required to submit them".

It's not a hypothetical problem, there was even news a few years ago about how businesses were complaining they had to send in a dozen+ disks at a time because of file formats.

The laws were written at the dawn of the digital age, in the 70s and 80s, stipulating specific storage media, and just never got updated because the government didn't view it as a problem.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah so I read the whole article and it's all phrased like it wants to convince you of that.

[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

You're welcome to do your own research, then. Or just make a call based off your read of their vibes, doesn't matter to me.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Upvoted because proper'ish use of 10 and one. :)

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Is there another way to express it except : ?

[–] psud@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

10 to 1. Many style guides require numbers lower than 10 to be spelt out. Many people think that what style guides say is "correct"

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I will never accept spelt nor smelt, unless we're talking about grains and ore refining, respectively.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's fine. Spelled vs spelt is different regionally in the UK. I was taught "spelled", I say it as spelled, but more often than not I type it spelt because it's easier on a glass keyboard

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Hahaha I can respect that. I do have a pretty big chip on my shoulder when it comes to language, semantics, syntax, whatever, but I will always let it slide if the counter argument is based around instrumental favorability.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Oh. Yeah I've never read a style guide.