this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
761 points (93.1% liked)

Avatar: The Last Airbender

1274 readers
32 users here now

A community for all things related to Avatar: The Last Airbender, Legend of Korra, cartoon or live action TV, movies, comics, novels, etc.

Rules:

Please report any rule violations.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blaze@discuss.online 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Definitely, but I feel like the second had a much lesser impact than the first

[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

It was weird how some of the sequences just looked like game renders. Especially when they're in the forest.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

This is because the tech is no longer revolutionary. Everything used and displayed on the first Avatar was a first time or completely new and bespoke piece of tech that had some visual impact apparent for the audience. Everything on the second one is been done on better films before or if it's brand new equipment or technique, is something that is not discernible by the audience through the screen. Also, nothing of importance or substance regarding the plot happens in any of the 3 hours of script. Perhaps the most boring film I watched in 2023.