this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
60 points (94.1% liked)

Australia

3605 readers
67 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
60
Linda Burney says there is everything to gain and nothing to lose by supporting the Voice (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 1 year ago by Ilandar@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The way the whole proposition has been framed (rightly or wrongly) is it's a pet-project for Albo, and comes across again as white folks telling Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander peoples "this'll be good for you, and it'll work this time ;) "

At the moment I don't see how the voice proposal is any different to the plethora of government agencies and outreach groups that have ultimately failed to make a difference over the years. If the referendum was actually two questions - constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander people, and a second one on the voice, there would probably be less resistance; I would hazard a guess that most people in the 'No' camp (except the actual racists) don't have issues with constitutional recognition per se, but with the lack of detail around the Voice itself.

[โ€“] Ilandar@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

The way the whole proposition has been framed (rightly or wrongly) is it's a pet-project for Albo, and comes across again as white folks telling Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander peoples "this'll be good for you, and it'll work this time ;) "

I agree that Labor has been virtue signalling pretty hard and is basically playing the familiar white saviour role yet again, but don't forget that the Voice was something put to them by Indigenous leaders themselves.

I would hazard a guess that most people in the 'No' camp (except the actual racists) don't have issues with constitutional recognition per se, but with the lack of detail around the Voice itself.

At least in terms of the Blak Sovereignty Movement, they take issue with the constitutional recognition bit but their main concern, and the one that is leading them to vote No, is that the Voice ultimately has no power and is still completely at the whim of the government of the day. They want Treaty and something akin to the model used in New Zealand, where Indigenous representatives actually have real power within the established political system.