this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
250 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

59345 readers
5951 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
250
A New York Times copyright lawsuit could kill OpenAI (www.vox.com)
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A New York Times copyright lawsuit could kill OpenAI::A list of authors and entertainers are also suing the tech company for damages that could total in the billions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That goes against the fundamental idea of something being unlicensed, meaning there are no repercussions from using the content.

I think what you mean already exists: open source licenses. Some open source licenses stipulate that the material is free, can be modified, etc. and you can do whatever you want with it, but only on the condition that whatever you create is under the same open source license.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ugh I see what you mean - no I mean unlicensed as in 'they didn't bother to license copyrighted works' and public as in 'stuff they scraped from Reddit, Twitter, and etc. without permission from anyone'.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Ah gotcha.