this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
956 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59627 readers
3363 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

One thing I have noticed is any search is more likely to pop up a news article with that word vs a good article on it. Look up say a band and I will get a lot of articles about some recent things they did vs the website for the band or an indepth look at the band. I really don't need twenty versions of the same article from news networks all copying each other. It feels like it is favoring new stuff first and can't see that it is repeating itself.

Duck duck go still works better.

[–] UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Seconded. Looking up a past event on a subject (like a band) that has had a more recent, especially "viral" event happen to it, is like wrestling a shaved bear.

Nevermind that all of the recent shit is just articles quoting eachother, adding virtually nothing of value except noise.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Human: Hey Google can you tell me how this band got started and the significance of their first album?

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Human: oh that's sad, I hope they get the help they need but about my questions--

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

Google: the lead singer was just admitted to rehab and you won't believe what happens next!

This is actually a slight improvement

[–] Shampoo_Bottle@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Then if do you click the link, the article has almost nothing to do with the title. No confirmations, no details, just random claims from someone who you've never heard of before.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

That's more the type of prompt you would give a LLM, rather than a search engine. I'm not surprised that it results in garbage.