this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
1002 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59602 readers
3755 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 80 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I will download videos then. I refuse to not use an adblocker on the modern internet.

[–] muh_entitlement@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Pirate everything, it's the only way to show greedy corporations the content should be free.

[–] weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It would be really cool to be able to download YouTube videos withour the sponsorship segments, I wonder if there is a way to do his already?

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

yt-dlp has a command-line option to download videos while using sponsor block.

yt-dlp https://youtube... --sponsorblock-remove all
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Like the ads surrounding the video and breaking the video up or the spots in the video where the creator hawks their latest wares?

[–] KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

On android, I use Seal. Its basically a frontend for yt-dlp and has a sponsor block feature.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Honestly, I'm ok with at least giving channel ad reads a shot. Those aren't based on my watch history/search history and the channel owner actually gets a good cut. Almost nobody can make a living with google ads.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I swore I've seen a FOSS project that did that. An ad segment detector basically

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

If I see one more PCBWay ad...

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

My worry with all this is that they might say fuck it and put DRM for all YouTube videos which would block attempts to download the videos. Not make it impossible as seen with streaming services but not as trivial as now....

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] DoctorRoxxo@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Heck yeah let’s all go to break.com

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Didn't know this was still a thing haha. It brings me back

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I already subscribed to someone on Floatplane. If it gets much worse on YouTube, it might be time to switch fully.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The day they go 100% paywalled, is the day their dominance ends. They will never do this because, contrary to the corporate dickriders in this thread they rely on bait and switch tactics to draw the crowd in the first place.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

I didn't say anything about paywalled.

[–] rabiddolphin@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Google's plan is to DRM the web

[–] gila@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well the good news is Widevine is very expensive, and doesn't work. It's not as simple as right click / save target as, but Widevine decryption is why you can torrent any of the shows/movies on those streaming services.

Everytime someone requests a video on those services, the service pays a fee to Widevine. $0.50 USD per request for the first 30k requests/month. How much you think Google is willing to pay someone for you to watch cat videos for free?

[–] wolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Google owns Widevine, they would be paying a fee to themselves

[–] gila@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

You're right. But then it's also their cost incurred. Their decryption keys to revoke on exploited devices, and their engineers to try and come up with a software patch for their hardware-level CDM. It's costly was my point.