this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
429 points (85.9% liked)

Technology

59345 readers
5327 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No matter what, it's always good to use less of a resource, if you can get the same outcome. It's efficiency basically.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Less of one doesn't meant less overall.

Lithium is incredibly abundant, we just need to scale up production if we're going to use so much.

LFP batteries are great because iron and phosphorus are also plentiful and cheap.

But if this other chemistry is less Lithium but requires platinum, well maybe thats not good.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Batteries are also very recyclable, so we need a system in place for this, and then we'll go far in terms of earth's resources.

Because both resources, even though they are plentiful, are still finite.